Trademarks, Brand Architecture & Trade Dress
Clearance opinions, USPTO Section 1(a) and Section 1(b) trademark prosecution, Office Action responses, TTAB opposition defense, and brand licensing.
Comprehensive federal and Michigan intellectual property representation covering USPTO trademark registration, copyright and software protection, patent strategy, commercial licensing, and courtroom enforcement.
Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents & Trade Secrets ยท Lead Counsel: Reese Serra (P74482), Matt Wozniak, JD / CPA, Brian D. Harrison
Federal trademarks under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) protect brand identifiers, company names, logos, taglines, and distinctive trade dress that signify commercial source and goodwill. Federal copyrights (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) protect original creative expression, marketing photography, architectural plans, and proprietary software source code from unauthorized copying and distribution.
Federal patents under Title 35 (35 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) grant time-limited exclusive rights over functional mechanical, electrical, software-implemented, or chemical inventions and ornamental product designs. Together with statutory trade secret protections under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and Michigan UTSA, coordinated IP counsel turns operational innovation into transferable enterprise equity.
Drafting precision, JD/CPA tax coordination, corporate entity alignment, and courtroom enforcement from our downtown Rochester team.
Clearance opinions, USPTO Section 1(a) and Section 1(b) trademark prosecution, Office Action responses, TTAB opposition defense, and brand licensing.
U.S. Copyright Office registrations preserving statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. 412, SaaS source-code chain of title, work-made-for-hire agreements, and DMCA enforcement.
Dedicated counsel backed by significant experience with provisional, utility, and design patents, Freedom-to-Operate opinions, USPTO prosecution, and licensing.
A company's name, product line identifiers, and logo systems often carry more transferable value than physical inventory or leased space. Clearing a mark only against a state corporate database leaves a business exposed to senior federal registrants and common-law users across the country.
Our team structures brand protection from pre-launch knockout and comprehensive clearance searches through Principal and Supplemental Register prosecution before the USPTO, managing both Section 1(a) in-use filings and Section 1(b) intent-to-use applications, substantive Office Actions, Madrid Protocol international filings, and ongoing Section 8, 9, and 15 incontestability maintenance.
Although copyright attaches automatically when an original work is fixed in tangible or digital form, timely registration with the U.S. Copyright Office is essential under 17 U.S.C. 411 and 412 before filing federal suit or recovering statutory damages and attorney's fees.
We work closely with technology startups, SaaS platforms, creative agencies, production houses, and manufacturers to establish airtight chain of title across employees, independent contractors, and third-party vendors, eliminating ownership gaps that routinely derail venture financings and M&A closings.
For manufacturing, automotive, medical device, hardware, and proprietary software businesses, protecting functional technical advantages requires coordinating public patent disclosures carefully with confidential trade secrets.
Backed by significant patent experience, our firm evaluates which technical innovations merit utility or design patent filings with the USPTO and which manufacturing processes, pricing algorithms, formulas, or customer systems are stronger when maintained as restricted trade secrets under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act (MCL 445.1901 et seq.).
Clearance opinions, Nice classification strategy, Specimens of Use, Statement of Use extensions, and nationwide federal trademark portfolio management.
U.S. Copyright Office filings, source-code deposit redaction, contractor present-assignment agreements, and clean-room IP audits.
Provisional priority filings, non-provisional utility claims, industrial design protection, and international PCT planning handled alongside experienced patent counsel.
Negotiating exclusive/non-exclusive IP licenses, franchise brand standards, OEM supply IP terms, and Joint Development Agreements.
Enforceable confidentiality covenants, proprietary data handling governance, and DTSA/MUTSA protection for non-public industrial know-how.
Cease-and-desist campaigns, preliminary injunctions, federal district court trial representation, and negotiated coexistence or royalty settlements.
Every trademark application, copyright assignment, patent strategy, and trade secret protocol is engineered around controlling federal titles and Michigan statutory standards.
The Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.): Governing federal trademark registration, Principal vs. Supplemental Register rights, likelihood of confusion, dilution, and civil remedies.
The Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.): Governing subject matter of copyright, work-made-for-hire ownership under Section 101, timely registration under Section 412, and statutory damages up to $150,000 per work for willful infringement.
The Patent Act & America Invents Act (35 U.S.C. 101 et seq.): Establishing first-inventor-to-file priority, utility and design patentability standards, disclosure duties, and infringement remedies.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1836): Providing a federal private civil cause of action, ex parte seizure authority in extraordinary circumstances, and exemplary damages for willful misappropriation.
Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act / MUTSA (MCL 445.1901 to 445.1910): Defining reasonable secrecy measures, injunctive relief, and damages for misappropriation of commercial know-how in Michigan.
Michigan Trademark & Service Mark Act (MCL 429.31 to 429.46): Governing state-level registration of marks used intrastate across Michigan.
Work directly with senior Michigan attorneys who unite private-client estate architecture, CPA tax fluency, commercial real estate closings, and trial advocacy.
Review our dedicated Patent Law & Prosecution practice covering provisional and non-provisional utility patents, design patents, Freedom-to-Operate clearances, and experienced USPTO prosecution.
Clear answers to the statutory, tax, and practical questions Michigan families and business owners ask most often.
Each IP regime protects a different business layer. Trademarks protect names, logos, and brand identity; copyrights protect creative text, graphics, video, and software code; patents protect functional machines, processes, software methods, or ornamental industrial designs; and trade secrets protect undisclosed formulas, manufacturing methods, or pricing data kept strictly confidential.
Yes. Under Section 1(b) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1051(b)), an applicant with a bona fide intent to use a mark in commerce can file an Intent-to-Use application to lock in a nationwide constructive priority date before launch, then submit a Statement of Use once sales begin.
Not automatically. Without a written, signed agreement expressly assigning intellectual property or satisfying statutory work-made-for-hire rules under 17 U.S.C. 101, independent contractors generally retain underlying copyright ownership and the client holds only an implied license.
Under 17 U.S.C. 412, if a copyright is registered prior to infringement or within three months of first publication, the owner becomes eligible to pursue statutory damages and recover attorney's fees in federal court without having to prove exact lost-profit figures.
Acquirers routinely examine missing founder/contractor invention assignments, lapsed USPTO maintenance filings, unrecorded patent or trademark assignments, open-source GPL license contamination in proprietary code, and unresolved third-party cease-and-desist correspondence.
Yes. Our corporate, JD/CPA, and trial teams coordinate seamlessly across USPTO clearance/registration, licensing/M&A structuring, TTAB proceedings, and federal litigation in Michigan and nationwide.
Share a few details about the decision, transaction, or dispute in front of you. Our team runs a conflict check first, then connects you with the right attorney.
Submitting this form starts a conflict check and does not create an attorney-client relationship until a written engagement agreement is signed.
All required fields help us respond faster.
Loading the secure form...